The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently released a report detailing whether or not certain companies that had fallen victim to cyber-related frauds had violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to have proper internal accounting controls. The nine companies investigated by the SEC fell prey to fraudulent “business email compromise” schemes, which are responsible for the highest estimated out-of-pocket losses of any cyber-related crimes in the last five years. The primary question for the SEC was whether or not the companies had failed to enact compliant internal accounting controls that may have prevented such fraud.
This alert details the SEC’s finding and advice for companies in an environment where cybersecurity is increasingly complicated and essential.
Read the full alert.
Pursuant to their fiduciary duties, investment advisers have certain obligations to seek out “best execution” for client transactions. The SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) recently issued a Risk Alert identifying deficiencies found during examinations of investment advisers’ compliance with their best execution obligations.
In this alert, partner Jim Lundy and associate Kellilyn Greco outline OCIE’s findings, including background on best execution, notable deficiencies, and recommended best practices.
Read the full alert.
On April 6, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a court order freezing more than $27 million in proceeds from alleged illegal distributions and sales of restricted shares of a public company, and charged the company, its CEO, and three other affiliated individuals. That same day, the Nasdaq Stock Market said it halted trading in the company’s stock. The SEC’s complaint alleges that shortly after the company began trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market and announced the acquisition of a purported blockchain-empowered cryptocurrency business that its stock price rose dramatically until its market capitalization exceeded $3 billion. The SEC further alleges that the CEO and the three other individual defendants then illegally sold large blocks of their restricted shares to the public while the stock price was excessively elevated and that they collectively reaped more than $27 million … Read More »