Category: DOJ


DOJ and SEC Announce Charges Connected to Hack of SEC’s EDGAR System

Posted on January 22nd, by and in Cybersecurity, DOJ, SEC. Comments Off on DOJ and SEC Announce Charges Connected to Hack of SEC’s EDGAR System

Last week, the Department
of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Securities & Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) announced charges connected to a large-scale,
international conspiracy to hack into the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering,
Analysis and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system and profit by trading on stolen
material, non-public information. The
conduct underlying these cases was one of the principal reasons that the SEC created
its Division of Enforcement “Cyber Unit” to target cyber-related
securities fraud violations.

In a 16-count indictment unsealed in
the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, two Ukrainian
citizens, Artem Radchenko and Oleksander Ieremenko, were charged with
securities fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, computer fraud conspiracy,
wire fraud, and computer fraud. The SEC’s complaint charged nine defendants – Ieremenko,
six traders in California, Ukraine, and Russian, and two entities – with antifraud
violations of the federal securities laws.

The charging documents allege that
Ieremenko and Radchenko hacked into the EDGAR system and stole thousands … Read More »


Department of Justice Announces Important Revisions to the Yates Memo

Posted on December 12th, by and in Cooperation, Corporate Disclosures, DOJ, Self-Reporting. Comments Off on Department of Justice Announces Important Revisions to the Yates Memo

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein recently announced significant changes to the Department of Justice’s corporate enforcement policy regarding individual accountability, previously announced in the 2015 Yates Memo. The revised policy no longer requires companies who are the target of DOJ investigations to identify all parties involved in potential misconduct before they can be eligible to receive any cooperation credit. This alert examines the updated policy, which should provide companies with greater flexibility in conducting investigations and negotiating dispositions with DOJ in both criminal and civil cases.

Read the full alert.


Department of Justice Announces New Policy on Coordination of Enforcement Actions and Corporate Penalties

Posted on May 15th, by in DOJ. Comments Off on Department of Justice Announces New Policy on Coordination of Enforcement Actions and Corporate Penalties

The Department of Justice has established a new policy that requires its attorneys to coordinate with one another and with other enforcement authorities when imposing multiple penalties for the same conduct. This policy is likely to protect companies from unfair outcomes resulting from a lack of coordination among the DOJ and other authorities.

I authored an alert that provides an overview of the new policy and discusses the potential impact on companies affected.

Click here to read the alert.


The Government Suffers a Spoofing Setback

Posted on April 27th, by and in CFTC, DOJ, Spoofing. Comments Off on The Government Suffers a Spoofing Setback

On April 25, 2018, a New Haven federal jury acquitted a former trader with a global bank accused of scheming to manipulate the precious metals futures markets with “spoofing,” a trading tactic that involves the use of allegedly deceptive bids or offers to feign the appearance of supply or demand. This appears to be one of the first setbacks for the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and futures self-regulatory organizations since they began aggressively investigating and civilly and criminally charging futures traders with spoofing several years ago. After successfully defeating Michael Coscia’s appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, this aggression accelerated with the CFTC’s and DOJ’s coordinated charges in January against several firms and traders. This verdict, however, may cause them to re-visit their aggression and certain strategies.

While it is … Read More »


The CFTC and DOJ Crack Down Harder on Spoofing & Supervision

Posted on February 6th, by and in CFTC, Civil Penalties, Criminal Liability, DOJ, Spoofing. Comments Off on The CFTC and DOJ Crack Down Harder on Spoofing & Supervision

Last week, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) filed their most significant and aggressive actions against spoofers and the firms employing them for failing to supervise. The CFTC filed settled actions against each of the global firms for supervisory violations, amongst other charges, and the CFTC charged six individuals with alleged commodities fraud and spoofing schemes. In the parallel criminal actions, the DOJ announced criminal charges against eight individuals (the six charged by the CFTC plus two others). The CFTC’s and DOJ’s coordinated and complex investigative efforts and filings indicate increased aggressiveness by both in this area. Further, these efforts represent the greatest amount of cooperation ever between the CFTC and DOJ. As reported previously in this blog post, with the affirmation of the conviction of high-frequency trader Michael Coscia, we are likely witnessing a … Read More »




From the Blog:

The SEC Speaks . . . and Cooperation is Key

SEC Speaks, the SEC’s annual conference in Washington, D.C., often provides valuable insight into developments at the agency, as well as pronouncements about policy...

District Court Holds SEC Cannot Use CEO’s Criminal Conviction to Establish Company’s Liability

Recently, the Northern District of Illinois denied the SEC summary judgment on its claims against a company charged with fraudulently offering and failing to register securities....

The First SEC Share Class Selection Disclosure Settlements: What We Learned & What’s Next?

Jim Lundy and Ben McCulloch authored an article entitled “The First SEC Share Class Selection Disclosure Settlements: What We Learned & What’s Next?” for...